The phrase references a state of affairs the place one thing, typically an accusation or statement, appears notably related or relevant to a selected particular person, on this case, Monica Asis. The expression originates from the idiom “if the shoe suits, put on it,” suggesting acceptance of a reality or accountability when it aligns with one’s actions or traits. For example, if a commentary criticizes questionable enterprise practices and Monica Asis is understood for such practices, observers would possibly say “if the shoe suits Monica Asis.”
The importance of this phrase on this context lies in its potential to focus on a connection between a common assertion or criticism and a selected particular person. This may be useful for understanding the implications of a broader problem and the way it pertains to a selected case. Traditionally, the idiom has served as a concise approach to name consideration to non-public accountability and the popularity of 1’s personal involvement in a state of affairs, good or dangerous.
